Physicians Academy
Established in December 2006 by the Kashmir Academy Of Private Physicians
Table Of Contents
Editorial :
 Illegal Practice in Kashmir
Article 1 :
 The prevalence of Community Acquired Multi-resistance organisms, Urinary Tract Infection in Kashmir, India: a Pilot Study
Article 2 :
 Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
Picture of The Month :
 Picture of The Month February 2018
Drug Update :
 XTANDI® (enzalutamide)
Abstracts from Other Journals :
 Abstracts from Other Journals-February 2018

Locations of visitors to this page
Feb 2018 ( Volume -12 Number -2)

Article 2
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
Sarosh Ahmed Khan, MD; FACP
Rapid Response  |  Back

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation

Sarosh Ahmed Khan, MBBS; MD; FACP

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) also known as bacteriotherapy, fecal microbiota reconstitution, or human probiotic infusion is the transfer of stool from a healthy donor into the gastrointestinal tract of a recipient for the purpose of treating recurrent Clostridium difficile colitis(1). The main aim is to restore the microbiota.

The precise mechanisms of FMT in the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated Disease (CDAD) or C. difficile infection (CDI) remain unclear, but may involve the re-colonization of microbiota with missing components to generate colonization resistance or direct antagonistic activity of the normal microbiota to C. difficile. Unlike the transient use of antibiotics (e.g. vancomycin) for C. difficile, implanted microbiota may provide a prolonged presence of 'antagonistic' activity, break the cycle of antimicrobial use, and prevent future colonization by C. difficile(2).

FMT by nasogastric tube (NGT) showed that it is more effective than oral vancomycin in preventing further recurrences in individuals who have already had recurrent C. difficile colitis(3).

CDAD: Clostridium difficile is a Gram-positive, spore-forming bacteria, and the most important and common nosocomial pathogen of healthcare-associated diarrhea in hospitalized patients in developed countries. One fourth of all cases of antibiotic-associated diarrhea is due to this infection and causes almost all cases of pseudomembranous colitis. The infection can be mild to severe, ranging from mild diarrhea to life-threatening complications, such as ileal perforation, fulminant colitis, toxic megacolon, or brain empyema(4). Recently CDAD has become more frequent and severe, more refractory to standard therapy, and more likely to relapse(5,6). This pattern is widely observed in Canada, the United States, and Europe and is attributed to a new hypervirulent strain of C. difficile called NAP1/BI/027(7,8).

Mature colonic bacterial microbiota in a healthy adult is generally resistant to C. difficile colonization. Any factors associated with the alteration of normal intestinal microbiota increases the risk of C. difficile colonization after exposure to the bacteria(9).

Risk factors for CDAD:

1.    Use of broad-spectrum antibiotics

2.    Concomitant use of multiple and prolonged antimicrobials(9-11).

3.    Advanced age (65 years or older).

4.    Recent transplantation.

5.    Gastrointestinal surgery.

6.    Use of immunosuppressive drugs.

7.    Use of proton pump inhibitors.

8.    Prolonged hospitalization

9.    Malnutrition.

10. Nasogastric tube feeding and presence of multiple co-morbidities(12-16).

11. The host immune response is considered the major determinant of outcome following exposure to C. difficile(17).

Standard treatment of CDAD includes: discontinuation of the offending/inducing antibiotics and C. difficile targeted antibiotic therapy with oral metronidazole, or vancomycin which is the only US FDA approved drug for CDAD(1,18-21). Although generally effective in the majority of patients in achieving clinical improvement, the use of antibiotics (e.g. vancomycin) does not restore intestinal microbiota, nor does it reduce the exposure to C. difficile in the environment, co-morbidities or other host risk factors(22,23).

Despite the fact that more than 90% of patients respond to the treatment initially, 20% to 60% of patients will experience at least one recurrence within a few weeks of completion of the vancomycin treatment(19,23-25). Therefore optimal management of multiple relapses remains clinically challenging.

Although there is limited evidence, FMT appears to be a safe and effective procedure. Symptoms improve immediately after FMT procedure and patients stay diarrhea free for several months or even years, indicating that FT could be an effective alternative in the treatment of patients with recurrent/refractory CDAD.

Indications for FMT:

1.    Recurrent Cl. difficile infection.

2.    Resistant Cl. difficile infection.

3.    Irritable Bowel Disease(26,27).

4.    Inflammatory Bowel Disease(28).

Potential Indications in the Future:

With renewed interest, presently work is being done on human microbiota and breakthrough has been made in three new fields:

1.    Gut microbiota promote bone growth via IGF1(29).

2.    Intestinal microbiota affects host physiology(30).

3.    Mucin degrading bacteria Akkermansia muciniphila modulate glucose metabolism(31,32).

Donor Criteria for FMT:

A potential donor prior to fecal transplantation should have the following prerequisites:

1.    No antibiotic exposure in the past six months.

2.    Not immunocompromised.

3.    Not have had any tattooing or body piercing in past six months.

4.    Not have any history of drug use.

5.    Not have any history of high-risk sexual behavior.

6.    Not have any history of incarceration.

7.    Not have recently traveled to endemic areas for Amebiasis or Giardiasis.

8.    Not have any chronic GI disorders, such as inflammatory bowel disease.

In the majority of the cases, the donors can be family members or relatives. Unrelated healthy volunteers can also donate. However the donor criteria mentioned above must be fulfilled by all donors.

Screening of Donors for FMT:

A potential donor should be screened for:

1.    Blood tests: Hepatitis A, B, and C serology; HIV; RPR for Syphilis.

2.    Stool tests: Ova and parasites; C. difficile PCR; culture and sensitivity; Giardia cyst or antigen.

3.    Any allergies.

FMT Procedure:

Before the procedure, patient has to follow specific preparation instructions.

1.    Pre-transplantation use of Antibiotics. Drugs used against CDAD, such as vancomycin or metronidazole, are prescribed prior to FMT to suppress the pathogen burden.

2.    Stop all antibiotics two days before the procedure.

3.    Liquid diet followed by an enema or laxative preparation the night before the procedure.

4.    Fecal transplantation is usually performed by Colonoscopy. As the colonoscope is withdrawn, the donor stool is delivered through the colonoscopy into the colon.

5.    Other Methods of FMT delivery:

a)    Gastroscopy

b)    Nasogastric tube Insertion

c)    Retention enema

d)    Oral Capsule (Fresh and Frozen microbiota)

Delivery Methods

In all studies, fresh donor feces were used to prepare fecal suspensions. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) bowel preparation was performed in two studies(33,34) in which fecal suspensions were delivered by colonoscopy.

For most patients FMT was performed by clinical specialists either in hospitals or outpatient clinical centers, whereas in the Canadian study(35) patients or their family members administered the procedures in their homes.

Volumes of fecal suspension delivery varied across the studies depending on the method of delivery used. In two studies(36,37) a small amount (25–30 mL) fecal suspension was infused through a nasogastric tube, once only, whereas in other studies a larger amount of fecal suspensions (200–600 mL) were delivered via gastroscopy, colonoscopy, or rectal retention enema, once only. The majority of patients received a single FMT procedure.

Through NGT: 30 g feces in 50–70 mL saline/25 mL(37), or 30 g feces in 150 mL saline/30 mL(36).

By Gastroscopy: 50–100 g feces in 250 mL saline/200 mL(38).

By Colonoscopy: quantity of feces not specified and 300–600 mL used(33).

By Retention Enema: 50 mL feces in 200 mL saline/250 mL(35).

Only a small number of patients needed second FMT when the first FMT failed(34,38) or symptoms reccurred(36) after the initial success.

Newer Modalities of treatment:

FMT can now be delivered by a capsule. This mode of delivery has been recently used to treat recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. This was an unblinded, randomized trial conducted in three academic centers in Alberta, Canada, between October 2014 and September 2016, with follow-up to December 2016. Results were published by JAMA(39). Among 116 patients, 57 were randomized to the capsule group and 59 to the colonoscopy group. One hundred and five patients (53 in the capsule group and 52 in the colonoscopy group) completed the trial. Recurrent C. diff. was prevented after a single treatment in 96.2% of the capsule group (51 of 53 patients) and the colonoscopy group (50 of 52 patients) (difference, 0%; P<0.001). FMT by capsule seems to be a safer, economical and convenient method of delivery. However rates of resolution of diarrhea following administration of FMT using frozen encapsulated inoculum from unrelated donors was 70% only(40) , though a recent study did not find any difference(41).

The various methods used to conduct FMT and their important features have been put up in the form of a table. See below for Table 1.

 Table 1. Various methods of FMT and their salient features.


FMT will soon become the preferred treatment for recurrent or resistant CDI. More randomized controlled studies are underway to help us understand its role regarding the safety, efficacy and modes of delivery. These will help us to compare different delivery methods of the fecal microbiota suspensions to establish superiority of one over another. Most studies till date do suggest that FMT administered by nasogastric tube, gastroscopy, colonoscopy, or retention enema and capsule is safe. All studies have reported promising results indicated by high response rate. Newer indications of FMT will bring in lot of promise in solving many long standing riddles in medical science.


1.             Bakken JS. Fecal bacteriotherapy for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Anaerobe 2009; 15: 285–9

2.             Borody TJ, Warren EF, Leis SM, Surace R, Ashman O, Siarakas S. Bacteriotherapy using fecal flora: toying with human motions. J Clin Gastroenterol 2004; 38: 475–83

3.             van Nood E, Vrieze A, Nieuwdorp M, et al. Duodenal infusion of donor feces for recurrent Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med 2013;368:407-15

4.             McFarland LV, Beneda HW, Clarridge JE, Raugi GJ. Implications of the changing face of Clostridium difficile disease for health care practitioners. Am J Infect Control 2007; 35: 237–53

5.             Kelly CP, Lamont JT. Clostridium difficile - more difficult than ever. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 1932–40

6.             Gravel D, Gardam M, Taylor G, et al. Infection control practices related to Clostridium difficile infection in acute care hospitals in Canada. AJIC 2009; 37:9–14

7.             Hookman P, Barkin JS. Clostridium difficile associated infection, diarrhea and colitis. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15: 1554–80

8.             Gravel D, Miller M, Clostridium difficile Surveillance Working Group. Clostridium difficile Associated Diarrhea in Acute-Care Hospitals Participating in CHISP: November 1, 2004 to April 30, 2005. Montreal PQ: Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program (CNISP.PCSIN), 2007

9.             Poutanen SM, Simor AE. Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in adults. CMAJ 2004; 171: 51–8

10.           Owens Jr RC, Donskey CJ, Gaynes RP, Loo VG, Muto CA. Antimicrobialassociated risk factors for Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 46(Suppl 1): S19–31

11.           Loo VG, Poirier L, Miller MA, et al. A predominantly clonal multi-institutional outbreak of Clostridium difficile - associated diarrhea with high morbidity and mortality. N Eng J Med 2005; 353: 2442–50

12.           Carter GP, Rood JI, Lyras D. The role of toxin A and toxin B in Clostridium difficile-associated disease: Past and present perspectives. Gut Microbes 2010; 1: 58–64

13.           Rodemann JF, Dubberke ER, Reske KA, Seo DH, Stone CD. Incidence of Clostridium difficule infection in inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Gastroenterol and Hepatol 2007; 5: 339–44

14.           Health Canada. C. difficile (Clostridium difficile). Available at: Accessed September 2, 2010

15.           Public Health Agency of Canada. Fact sheet - Clostridium difficile (C. difficile). Available at: Accessed January 13, 2010

16.           Calfee DP. Clostridium difficile: a reemerging pathogen. Geriatrics 2008; 63(9): 10–21

17.           Lamont JT. Clostridium difficile colitis. European Surgery - Acta Chirurgica Austriaca 2004; 36: 161–5

18.           McFee RB, Abdelsayed GG. Clostridium difficile. Dis Mon 2009; 55: 439–70

19.           Brandt LJ, Borody TJ, Campbell J. Endoscopic fecal microbiota transplantation: "first-line" treatment for severe Clostridium difficile infection? J Clin Gastroenterol 2011; 45: 655–7

20.           Cocanour CS. Best strategies in recurrent or persistent Clostridium difficile infection. Surgical Infections 2011; 12: 235–9

21.           Bartlett JG. Clostridium difficile: progress and challenges. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010; 1213: 62–9

22.           KuoLee R, Chen W. Non-antibiotic strategies for the prevention/treatment of Clostridium difficile infection. Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents 2008; 18: 1395–403

23.           Bauer MP, van Dissel JT. Alternative strategies for Clostridium difficile infection. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2009; 33(Suppl 1): S51–6

24.           Leffler DA, Lamont JT. Treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Gastroenterology 2009; 136: 1899–912

25.           Monaghan T, Boswell T, Mahida YR. Recent advances in Clostridium difficileassociated disease. Postgrad Med J 2009; 85: 152–62

26.           Pinn DM, Aroniadis OC, Brandt LJ. Is fecal microbiota transplantation the answer for irritable bowel syndrome? A single-center experience. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:1831–1832. [PubMed]

27.           Zoller V, Laguna AL, Prazeres Da Costa O, Buch T, Göke B, Storr M. Fecal microbiota transfer (FMT) in a patient with refractory irritable bowel syndrome]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2015 Aug;140(16):1232-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-103798. Epub 2015 Aug 11. [Article in German]

28.           Borody TJ, George L, Andrews P, Brandl S, Noonan S, Cole P, Hyland L, Morgan A, Maysey J, Moore-Jones D. Bowel-flora alteration: a potential cure for inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome?Med J Aust. 1989;150:604. [PubMed]

29.           Yan J. et al. Gut microbiota induce IGF-1 and promote bone formation and growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2016

30.           Thaiss CA et al. Microbiota diurnal rhythmicity programs host transcriptome oscillations. Cell 2016

31.           Greer RL. et al. Akkermansia muciniphila mediates negative effects of IFN on glucose metabolism. Nat Commun 2016

32.           de la Cuesta–Zuluaga J et al. Metformin is associated with higher relative abundance of mucin-degrading Akkermansia muciniphila and several short-chain fatty acid-producing microbiota in the gut. Diabetes Care 2016

33.           Mellow MH, Kanatzar A. Colonoscopic fecal bacteriotherapy in the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection–results and follow-up. J Okla State Med Assoc 2011; 104: 89–91

34.           Rohlke F, Surawicz CM, Stollman N. Fecal flora reconstitution for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: results and methodology. J Clin Gastroenterol 2010; 44: 567–70

35.           Silverman MS, Davis I, Pillai DR. Success of self-administered home fecal transplantation for chronic Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Gastroenterol & Hepatol 2010; 8: 471–3

36.           Macconnachie AA, Fox R, Kennedy DR, Seaton RA. Faecal transplant for recurrent Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea: a UK case series. QJM 2009; 102: 781–4

37.           Aas J, Gessert CE, Bakken JS. Recurrent Clostridium difficile colitis: case series involving 18 patients treated with donor stool administered via a nasogastric tube. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 36: 580–5

38.           Garborg K, Waagsbo B, Stallemo A, Matre J, Sundoy A. Results of fecal donor instillation therapy for recurrent Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. Scand J Infect Dis 2010; 42: 857–61

39.           Kao D, Roach B, Silva M et al. Effect of Oral Capsule- vs Colonoscopy-Delivered Fecal Microbiota Transplantation on Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Nov 28;318(20):1985-1993. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.17077

40.           Youngster I, Russell GH, Pindar C, Ziv-Baran T, Sauk J, Hohmann EL. Oral, capsulized, frozen fecal microbiota transplantation for relapsing Clostridium difficile infection. JAMA. 2014 Nov 5;312(17):1772-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.13875

41.           Tang G, Yin W, Liu W. Is frozen fecal microbiota transplantation as effective as fresh fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile infection: A meta-analysis? Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Aug;88(4):322-329. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.05.007 Epub 2017 May 18

42.           Yoon SS, Brandt LJ. Treatment of refractory/recurrent C. difficile associated disease by donated stool transplanted via colonoscopy: a case series of 12 patients. J Clin Gastroenterol 2010; 44: 562–6

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Author Information: Dr. Sarosh A. Khan is Senior Consultant, Internal Medicine and Director, Naseem Medical Center, Baghe-Mehtab, Srinagar, Kashmir, India. Pin: 190019. Affiliations: Governing Council Member of American College of Physicians (India Chapter) from 2014-2017. Email:

To Get This Article in PDF CLICK HERE

Rapid Response  |  Back
  Listed in Directory Of Open Access Journals (DOAJ).   ||    Google Scholar   ||    INFOPORT   ||    OAJSE  
  Copyright © 2018 Physicians Academy (ISSN : 0973-998X). All rights reserved.  |   Developed By: DZ International